The folly of arguing?

Freddie DeBoer calls into question the approaches of “aggressive atheists”:

I think the temptation among aggressive atheists is to think that they are just a few converts away from the great crumble, that if they could just move a few more people closer to their position, they’d win the day. This is folly. There are more people who claim a religious devotion than not, in this world, by billions. There are more in this country by millions. You don’t argue your way out of niches by constantly thumbing your noses at the people who you’re trying to convert. The question then becomes, are they converting at all? Or are they merely asserting superiority?

This entry was posted in Arguing, Atheism, PHIL 500 and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply